Training · London

Mental Health Workshops in London

Who this page is for

  • Line managers
  • Senior leaders
  • HR and wellbeing leads

Who These Workshops Are For

This page is for people who want to book a workshop, not read about wellbeing in general. Typically that is an HR director, a head of wellbeing, a head of learning and development or an operations lead. The brief tends to sound the same: managers can see that someone is struggling, and they say nothing because they are afraid of making it worse.

The workshops are for the people who hold those conversations. That means line managers, team leads and senior leaders, and sometimes whole teams, because colleagues may notice first. Every programme is built for one organisation. We do not run open courses, and we do not issue certificates.

If you want the argument before the format, start with our article on the mental health conversation managers avoid. This page describes the workshop that turns that argument into practised behaviour.

Several of our pages touch the same ground. The table shows where each one fits, so the brief lands on the right programme.

Which Sidestream page fits which brief.
PageFocusFits when
Mental health workshops (this page)Conversations with a colleague who may be strugglingManagers notice strain but avoid the conversation, or handle the return after absence badly
Difficult conversations trainingPerformance, redundancy, feedback, grievance and speak-up conversationsThe hard conversation is about the work itself
Resilience trainingTeam and change resilience under sustained pressureThe brief is workload, change fatigue and recovery across a team
Psychological safety trainingWhether a team feels safe to speak up and admit mistakesThe problem is the team climate, not one kind of conversation

What These Workshops Are Not

This needs saying plainly, before anything else. Sidestream does not provide clinical services. Our mental health workshops are not therapy, counselling or diagnosis, and they are not a substitute for Mental Health First Aid, occupational health, an employee assistance programme or a qualified professional. The scenarios are fictional, so no participant is asked to bring or disclose their own mental health.

What the workshop does is narrower. Acas puts the manager's position well in its guidance on talking about mental health: you should not be expected to be an expert in mental health. A manager's job in these moments is to notice, open the door, listen, agree what happens next and point towards the right support. None of that is clinical. All of it is behaviour, and behaviour can be rehearsed.

Where your organisation already runs Mental Health First Aid or awareness training, the workshop works alongside it. Awareness tells people what to look for. The rehearsal is where they practise what to say.

Why the Conversation Matters to an Employer

Poor mental health is costly for employers. Deloitte's report Mental health and employers (May 2024) estimates that poor mental health across the UK workforce can cost employers around £51 billion a year. The figure combines mental health related absence, presenteeism and staff turnover. Presenteeism, attending work in spite of illness and so not performing at full ability, is the largest part, at around £24 billion.

HSE's Work-related stress, depression or anxiety statistics in Great Britain, 2025, published on 20 November 2025, count 964,000 workers suffering from work-related stress, depression or anxiety in 2024/25, and 22.1 million working days lost. Among the main work factors respondents cited were workload pressures and a lack of managerial support. The cause data is older, an average over 2009/10 to 2011/12, which our note on HSE's stress cause data sets out. Managerial support is the part a workshop can reach.

HSE's Management Standards make the same point from the side of work design. One of their six areas is support, which includes the encouragement, sponsorship and resources provided by the organisation, line management and colleagues. HSE also publishes Stress Talking Toolkits, designed to help managers talk with workers as part of preventing and managing work-related stress.

The advice on timing is direct. HSE's advice for managers on mental ill health says: as soon as you notice that an employee is having difficulties, talk to them, because early action can prevent them becoming more unwell. Acas says that if you believe a worker has poor mental health, you should arrange a conversation as soon as possible. The guidance is clear. Doing it is the hard part.

Awareness Is Not the Same as the Conversation

The behaviour-change model we work from is COM-B, set out by Michie, van Stralen and West in Implementation Science (2011), in which capability, opportunity and motivation interact to generate behaviour. Capability covers both knowledge and skill. Awareness training mainly addresses knowledge: the signs, the language, where support sits. Holding the conversation under emotional pressure is the skill half.

The COM-B model: Behaviour happens when Capability, Opportunity and Motivation come together Three stacked fields join with pink arrows into one black field labelled Behaviour. Capability, physical and psychological: the physical and psychological capacity to act. Opportunity, physical and social: the external factors that make the act possible. Motivation, reflective and automatic: the internal processes that drive the act. All three must be present for a behaviour to occur. Source: Michie, van Stralen and West (2011), Implementation Science. Redrawn by Sidestream. THE COM-B MODEL CAPABILITY Physical · Psychological the physical and psychological capacity to act OPPORTUNITY Physical · Social the external factors that make the act possible MOTIVATION Reflective · Automatic the internal processes that drive the act BEHAVIOUR All three must be present for a behaviour to occur. Source: Michie, van Stralen and West (2011), Implementation Science. Redrawn by Sidestream.

COM-B: capability, opportunity and motivation interact to generate behaviour. Capability covers both knowledge and skill. Awareness training mainly addresses knowledge; holding the conversation under emotional pressure is the skill half.

Source: Michie, S., van Stralen, M. M. and West, R. (2011), Implementation Science 6, 42. Full text on PubMed Central. Redrawn by Sidestream.

One study points to that gap, with caveats. Schwarz and colleagues (2019), writing in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, followed managers for twelve months after a single-day training on mental health at work. Knowledge about mental illness improved and held. Social distance, how comfortable people say they are interacting with someone with a mental health problem, did not change significantly, although scores were already low at baseline.

The design had no control group, and the authors say further research is needed. They also suggest that such training could be improved by adding more emotionally focused parts that enhance the individual involvement. Rehearsal with an actor is one way to add such a part.

In a randomised 2020 UCL study by co-founder Ben Laumann (n = 57), rehearsal with a role-play coach produced significantly better feedback delivery than an instructional slideshow or video. Two independent assessors rated it blind. The effect sizes were Cohen's d = 0.75 against the slideshow and d = 1.08 against the video. The rehearsal condition was a short online coaching session, not our programme, and the study tested feedback, not a mental health conversation. It is unpublished. Details and limits are on our research page.

The same study found no relationship between participants' confidence and their blind-rated performance. Self-rated confidence rose after every format, with no significant difference between them, even though blind-rated behaviour did differ significantly. That is why we do not use confidence as the measure.

Confidence rose in every condition; only performance separated them Left: self-rated confidence on a 1 to 7 scale before the input, after it and after the feedback simulation, for slideshow, video and practice groups. All three lines rise, with no significant difference between them (time by modality interaction: p = .541). Right: blind-rated performance after the simulation. Practice 5.25, slideshow 4.26, video 3.82. Self-rated confidence Blind-rated performance 1 = no confidence, 7 = most confident Mean score after the simulation, two assessors 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Before After input After simulation Slideshow 4.46 to 5.39 Video 4.69 to 5.38 Practice 4.27 to 5.53 4.26 Slideshow 3.82 Video 5.25 Practice Laumann (2020), UCL, randomised, n = 57. Confidence rose in all three groups (modality: p = .958). Performance differed: d = 0.75 vs slideshow, 1.08 vs video, rated blind by two assessors. Source: sidestream-consulting.co.uk/research Confidence rose in every condition; only performance separated them Left: self-rated confidence on a 1 to 7 scale before the input, after it and after the feedback simulation, for slideshow, video and practice groups. All three lines rise, with no significant difference between them (time by modality interaction: p = .541). Right: blind-rated performance after the simulation. Practice 5.25, slideshow 4.26, video 3.82. Self-rated confidence 1 = no confidence, 7 = most confident 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Before After input After simulation Slideshow 4.46 to 5.39 Video 4.69 to 5.38 Practice 4.27 to 5.53 Blind-rated performance Mean score after the simulation, two assessors 4.26 Slideshow 3.82 Video 5.25 Practice Laumann (2020), UCL, randomised, n = 57. Confidence rose in all three groups (modality: p = .958). Performance differed: d = 0.75 vs slideshow, 1.08 vs video, rated blind by two assessors. Source: sidestream-consulting.co.uk/research

Self-rated confidence rose after every format, with no significant difference between them. Blind-rated behaviour did differ significantly. That is why we do not use confidence as the measure.

Source: Laumann (2020), UCL, randomised, n = 57; confidence on a 1 to 7 scale at three points, performance rated blind by two assessors. Details and limits are on our research page.

Stigma Shows Up as Behaviour

Stigma is usually discussed as an attitude. In a team it shows up as behaviour. Think of the joke that lands on someone who is struggling, or the quick change of subject. Or the colleague who quietly stops being given the difficult work, or the assumption that someone off sick will not come back. Those are moments a team can rehearse responding to.

Language is part of it. Acas advises managers to be sensitive in the terms they use, and gives an example: instead of saying 'suffering from mental health issues', say 'someone who has concerns related to their mental health'. A typical design builds that kind of moment into a scenario, so a team practises noticing and correcting it rather than only agreeing with it.

Sidestream has documented stigma work on a larger scale. The Death of Jane Doe, recognised at the CorpComms Awards, addresses mental health stigma in frontline work. With Met Police Lewisham and the Innocence Project, it was staged as an immersive crime-scene narrative for police officers and frontline staff who encounter people in mental health crisis. It was built around a fictional victim with schizophrenia and antisocial personality disorder, and the roles were scripted with clinical advisors.

It is a documented production, not a company workshop, and it is not what a workshop for your managers looks like. The production looked at how stigma and snap judgements distort frontline interventions. A workshop rehearses the one-to-one conversation instead. More on the production is on our immersive events page.

The Method: Professional Actors and Your Own Scenarios

Sidestream is a behaviour change consultancy based at 58 Malden Road, London NW5 3HG. Most of this work is delivered in-house at client offices across London. The other seat in every scenario is a professional actor, not a colleague reading a brief.

A short diagnostic first establishes where the conversations go wrong: which managers, which moments, which teams. The actor is then briefed on a fictional colleague whose situation fits that organisation. They respond the way that person plausibly would: deflecting, going quiet, saying "I'm fine", becoming upset.

Scenarios are written around the conversation, not around a diagnosis. That follows HSE's advice that managers should concentrate on making reasonable adjustments at work, rather than understanding the diagnosis. The actor plays a person, not a condition.

Each attempt is stopped, coached and run again. Feedback comes from the actor in role, from the facilitator and from peers. The actor can say when they felt invited in and when they felt managed, which a real colleague may never say. This is role-play training with professional actors, applied to the mental health conversation.

The Conversations We Rehearse

The five conversations a manager rehearses: opening, listening without fixing, holding the boundary, signposting to the right support and the return after absence Five fields joined by pink arrows. 1 Opening the conversation, HSE: open, exploratory and non-judgemental. 2 Listening without fixing, Acas: listen carefully to what they say. 3 Holding the boundary, Acas: you will not share what they tell you without their permission, unless there's a good reason to. 4 Signposting to the right support, Acas: an employee assistance programme, occupational health, the person's GP; if someone is in immediate danger, call 999. 5 The return after absence, HSE: lack of contact may mean they feel isolated, forgotten or unable to return. A black band below: The workshop does not teach crisis intervention. That belongs to Mental Health First Aid, occupational health and clinical professionals. THE CONVERSATIONS WE REHEARSE 1 Opening the conversation HSE: "open, exploratory and non-judgemental" 2 Listening without fixing Acas: "listen carefully to what they say" 3 Holding the boundary Acas: "you will not share what they tell you without their permission, unless there's a good reason to" 4 Signposting to the right support Acas: an employee assistance programme, occupational health, the person's GP If someone is in immediate danger, call 999. 5 The return after absence HSE: lack of contact may mean they feel "isolated, forgotten or unable to return" The workshop does not teach crisis intervention. That belongs to Mental Health First Aid, occupational health and clinical professionals. The five conversations a manager rehearses: opening, listening without fixing, holding the boundary, signposting to the right support and the return after absence Five stacked fields joined by pink arrows. 1 Opening the conversation, HSE: open, exploratory and non-judgemental. 2 Listening without fixing, Acas: listen carefully to what they say. 3 Holding the boundary, Acas: you will not share what they tell you without their permission, unless there's a good reason to. 4 Signposting to the right support, Acas: an employee assistance programme, occupational health, the person's GP; if someone is in immediate danger, call 999. 5 The return after absence, HSE: lack of contact may mean they feel isolated, forgotten or unable to return. A black band below: The workshop does not teach crisis intervention. That belongs to Mental Health First Aid, occupational health and clinical professionals. THE CONVERSATIONS WE REHEARSE CONVERSATION 1 Opening the conversation HSE: "open, exploratory and non-judgemental" CONVERSATION 2 Listening without fixing Acas: "listen carefully to what they say" CONVERSATION 3 Holding the boundary Acas: "you will not share what they tell you without their permission, unless there's a good reason to" CONVERSATION 4 Signposting to the right support Acas: an employee assistance programme, occupational health, the person's GP If someone is in immediate danger, call 999. CONVERSATION 5 The return after absence HSE: lack of contact may mean they feel "isolated, forgotten or unable to return" The workshop does not teach crisis intervention. That belongs to Mental Health First Aid, occupational health and clinical professionals.

The diagnostic decides which ones a programme rehearses, and in what depth.

Sidestream's own sequence of the five conversations, not a research finding. Quoted advice: HSE, Advice for managers on mental ill health conditions; Acas, Talking about mental health.

The five conversations below are the core of the format. The diagnostic decides which ones a programme rehearses, and in what depth. Each is written into a scenario and run more than once.

Opening the conversation

The first step is the opening itself. HSE advises managers with specific concerns to talk about these at an early stage and to ask questions in an open, exploratory and non-judgemental way. Acas adds practical conditions: talk in private, and be flexible about when and where.

A typical design has the actor play a colleague whose work has slipped and who answers every question with "I'm fine". The manager practises naming what they have noticed, specifically and without labels. They also practise leaving the door open when the answer is no, because Acas advises letting people know they can talk about their mental health at any time.

Listening without fixing

Once someone starts talking, the instinct is to solve. Acas advises managers to listen carefully to what they say, to keep questions open ended and to give the person as much time as they need. It also says a manager could agree to take time to think before making any decisions.

A typical design has the actor give a long, uncertain answer with a silence in the middle. The manager practises staying with the silence, reflecting back what they heard and not jumping to a plan.

Holding the boundary

A manager is not a therapist, and the conversation goes wrong when either side forgets that. Acas advises reassuring the person that you will not share what they tell you without their permission, unless there's a good reason to, and being clear about who you would share it with and why.

A typical design has the actor ask the manager to keep something to themselves that the manager cannot keep, or pull the manager into the role of counsellor. The manager practises being honest about what they can and cannot do. Acas also reminds managers that supporting others can be a challenge and that they should look after their own wellbeing.

Signposting to the right support

Signposting only works if the manager can name the route. Acas lists an employee assistance programme, occupational health and the person's GP among the places to encourage someone to go, and says plainly: If someone is in immediate danger, call 999. HSE adds that if the person does not want to speak to their manager, the manager can suggest someone else.

A typical design has the manager practise naming the organisation's own support routes, concretely and without pressure. The workshop does not teach crisis intervention. That belongs to Mental Health First Aid, occupational health and clinical professionals.

The return after absence

The return after absence needs preparing too. HSE warns that if an employee goes off sick, lack of contact or involvement from their manager may mean they feel isolated, forgotten or unable to return. It advises discussing the return and reintegration beforehand, and notes that a written plan can help.

A typical design rehearses two moments: the keep-in-touch call during absence, and the first meeting back. The manager practises agreeing what happens in the first weeks and asking about reasonable adjustments. Acas notes that if a worker's mental health problem is a disability, or could reasonably be believed to be one, the employer must make reasonable adjustments.

How an Engagement Runs

The sequence is the same for every brief. What changes is the length of delivery and the number of cohorts.

  1. First call. A free 30-minute call with a founder about the conversations managers avoid and the teams involved.
  2. Diagnostic, one to three weeks. Interviews, focus groups and a behavioural diagnostic establish where the conversations break down.
  3. Design, weeks four to seven. Scenarios are written from the organisation's own context and support routes, and the actors are briefed on them.
  4. Delivery. From a half-day workshop to two or three days, or a multi-session programme over weeks or months.
  5. Embedding, six to eight weeks. Manager toolkits and 15-minute weekly check-ins protect the new behaviour after delivery.
  6. Measurement. Observed behaviour is re-read three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days.

A typical engagement runs 12 to 16 weeks from the first call to the follow-up measurement, depending on format. Work is priced per engagement, because the effort sits in the scenario design. The six phases are described in full on our client journey page.

Group sizes follow the rehearsal. A single team trains as a group of 8 to 12; cohorts of several teams from one organisation are 12 to 25. Everyone needs a turn in front of the actor, which is why cohorts stay at that size.

Client journey in six phases, from a free 30-minute call to measurement three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days Six numbered phases in sequence. Phase 01, Week 0 · 30 minutes, Free Consultation: a 30-minute call with one of our founders. No deck. Phase 02, Weeks 1 to 3, Consulting: where confidentiality allows, interviews, focus groups and a behavioural diagnostic. Phase 03, Weeks 4 to 7, Bespoke Build: a custom scenario built around your sector and people. Phase 04, Delivery Week, Live Programme: from a half-day workshop to two or three days of live, immersive practice. Phase 05, Weeks 9 to 16, Booster and Rituals: manager toolkits, 15-minute weekly check-ins. Phase 06, 3 to 6 weeks and around 90 days after delivery, Measure and Scale: we re-run the diagnostic to measure delta on the behaviours we set out to move. Two measurement points: 3 to 6 weeks after delivery, and around 90 days after delivery. A bracket from phase 01 to the first measurement point reads: 12 to 16 weeks from the first call to the follow-up measurement, depending on format. Not to scale. 01 02 03 04 05 06 WEEK 0 30 MINUTES Free Consultation A 30-minute call with one of our founders. No deck. WEEKS 1 TO 3 Consulting Where confidentiality allows, we run interviews, focus groups and a behavioural diagnostic. WEEKS 4 TO 7 Bespoke Build A custom scenario built around your sector and people. DELIVERY WEEK Live Programme From a half-day workshop to two or three days of live, immersive practice. WEEKS 9 TO 16 Booster & Rituals Manager toolkits, 15-minute weekly check-ins. 3 TO 6 WEEKS AND AROUND 90 DAYS AFTER DELIVERY Measure & Scale We re-run the diagnostic to measure delta on the behaviours we set out to move. 3 to 6 weeks after delivery around 90 days after delivery 12 to 16 weeks from the first call to the follow-up measurement, depending on format Not to scale. Client journey in six phases, from a free 30-minute call to measurement three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days Six numbered phases in sequence. Phase 01, Week 0 · 30 minutes, Free Consultation: a 30-minute call with one of our founders. No deck. Phase 02, Weeks 1 to 3, Consulting: where confidentiality allows, interviews, focus groups and a behavioural diagnostic. Phase 03, Weeks 4 to 7, Bespoke Build: a custom scenario built around your sector and people. Phase 04, Delivery Week, Live Programme: from a half-day workshop to two or three days of live, immersive practice. Phase 05, Weeks 9 to 16, Booster and Rituals: manager toolkits, 15-minute weekly check-ins. Phase 06, 3 to 6 weeks and around 90 days after delivery, Measure and Scale: we re-run the diagnostic to measure delta on the behaviours we set out to move. Two measurement points: 3 to 6 weeks after delivery, and around 90 days after delivery. A bracket from phase 01 to the first measurement point reads: 12 to 16 weeks from the first call to the follow-up measurement, depending on format. Not to scale. 01 02 03 04 05 06 WEEK 0 · 30 MINUTES Free Consultation A 30-minute call with one of our founders. No deck. WEEKS 1 TO 3 Consulting Where confidentiality allows, we run interviews, focus groups and a behavioural diagnostic. WEEKS 4 TO 7 Bespoke Build A custom scenario built around your sector and people. DELIVERY WEEK Live Programme From a half-day workshop to two or three days of live, immersive practice. WEEKS 9 TO 16 Booster & Rituals Manager toolkits, 15-minute weekly check-ins. 3 TO 6 WEEKS AND AROUND 90 DAYS AFTER DELIVERY Measure & Scale We re-run the diagnostic to measure delta on the behaviours we set out to move. 3 to 6 weeks after delivery around 90 days after delivery 12 to 16 weeks from the first call to the follow-up measurement, depending on format Not to scale.

The sequence is the same for every brief. A typical engagement runs 12 to 16 weeks from the first call to the follow-up measurement, depending on format. Observed behaviour is re-read three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days.

Sidestream's own method description, not a research finding.

How the Result Is Measured

Kirkpatrick's four levels rise from reaction and learning to behaviour and results; Sidestream measures observed behaviour at Level 3, three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days, and Level 4 where the brief allows Four steps rising from left to right on a common baseline. Level 1, Reaction: Did participants like the training? Post-training satisfaction surveys or smile sheets. Level 2, Learning: Did they acquire knowledge or skills? Post-training assessments, quizzes, or skills demonstrations. Level 3, Behaviour, the yellow step with a pink tab reading Sidestream measures here: Did they change their behaviour at work? Observational data collected in the actual workplace; three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days. Level 4, Results, dashed outline: Did the behaviour change produce business outcomes? One or two specific downstream metrics; Level 4 where the brief allows. Measurement commitment: Sidestream's own method description, not a research finding. Source: Kirkpatrick, J. and Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016), Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. KIRKPATRICK'S FOUR LEVELS LEVEL 1 REACTION Did participants like the training? Post-training satisfaction surveys or smile sheets LEVEL 2 LEARNING Did they acquire knowledge or skills? Post-training assessments, quizzes, or skills demonstrations LEVEL 3 BEHAVIOUR Did they change their behaviour at work? Observational data collected in the actual workplace three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days SIDESTREAM MEASURES HERE LEVEL 4 RESULTS Did the behaviour change produce business outcomes? One or two specific downstream metrics Level 4 where the brief allows Kirkpatrick's four levels rise from reaction and learning to behaviour and results; Sidestream measures observed behaviour at Level 3, three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days, and Level 4 where the brief allows Four stacked cards, Level 4 at the top and Level 1 at the bottom, each with a black step bar that widens with the level. Level 1, Reaction: Did participants like the training? Post-training satisfaction surveys or smile sheets. Level 2, Learning: Did they acquire knowledge or skills? Post-training assessments, quizzes, or skills demonstrations. Level 3, Behaviour, the yellow card with a pink tab reading Sidestream measures here: Did they change their behaviour at work? Observational data collected in the actual workplace; three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days. Level 4, Results, dashed outline: Did the behaviour change produce business outcomes? One or two specific downstream metrics; Level 4 where the brief allows. Measurement commitment: Sidestream's own method description, not a research finding. Source: Kirkpatrick, J. and Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016), Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. KIRKPATRICK'S FOUR LEVELS LEVEL 4 · RESULTS Did the behaviour change produce business outcomes? One or two specific downstream metrics Level 4 where the brief allows SIDESTREAM MEASURES HERE LEVEL 3 · BEHAVIOUR Did they change their behaviour at work? Observational data collected in the actual workplace three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days LEVEL 2 · LEARNING Did they acquire knowledge or skills? Post-training assessments, quizzes, or skills demonstrations LEVEL 1 · REACTION Did participants like the training? Post-training satisfaction surveys or smile sheets

Sidestream measures observed behaviour at Level 3, not the smile sheet. Level 3 as the minimum, Level 4 where the brief allows.

Source: Kirkpatrick, J. and Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016), Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Measurement commitment: Sidestream's own method description, not a research finding.

Measurement sits at Kirkpatrick Level 3, meaning observed behaviour back at work, rather than at Level 1 satisfaction. A feedback form tells you whether people found the session useful. It does not tell you whether the next check-in with a struggling colleague went differently. Download our four-level measurement framework (PDF), with a worksheet for your own programme.

Before delivery we agree a small number of behavioural indicators with the client. They are re-read three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days. Typical indicators include:

The indicators describe what managers do, not anyone's health. Background is in the Kirkpatrick model explained.

Mental Health Workshops in London: In Short

Deloitte estimates that poor mental health can cost UK employers around £51 billion a year. HSE lists a lack of managerial support among the main work factors behind work-related stress, depression or anxiety. HSE and Acas both advise managers to talk early. This is why our mental health workshops in London build a rehearsed conversation, not only awareness.

Professional actors play the colleague who may be struggling, and managers practise opening, listening, holding boundaries, signposting and the return after absence. The workshops are not clinical and do not replace Mental Health First Aid or professional support. Progress is measured on observed behaviour.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens in a mental health workshop for managers?

It is rehearsal rather than a presentation. A professional actor plays a colleague who may be struggling, and managers hold the conversation live: opening it, listening, agreeing next steps and signposting to support. Each attempt is stopped, coached and run again. Programmes are delivered in-house at client offices across London, for one organisation at a time.

Is this therapy, counselling or Mental Health First Aid?

No. Sidestream does not provide clinical services. The workshops are not therapy, counselling or diagnosis, and they do not replace Mental Health First Aid, occupational health, an employee assistance programme or a qualified professional. They rehearse the everyday conversation a manager or colleague has to hold, and they work alongside Mental Health First Aid or awareness training.

Do you run open mental health courses or issue certificates?

No. Every programme is built for one organisation, with scenarios drawn from that organisation's own context and support routes. We do not run open or public courses, and we do not issue certificates. The first step is a free 30-minute call about the managers involved and the conversations they avoid.

How long does it take, and how big are the groups?

Delivery runs from a half-day workshop to two or three days, or a multi-session programme over weeks or months. A typical engagement runs 12 to 16 weeks from the first call to the follow-up measurement, depending on format. A single team trains as a group of 8 to 12; cohorts of several teams from one organisation are 12 to 25.

Is The Death of Jane Doe a mental health workshop?

No. The Death of Jane Doe, recognised at the CorpComms Awards, is an immersive theatre production that addresses mental health stigma in frontline work. It was made with Met Police Lewisham and the Innocence Project for police officers and frontline staff who encounter people in mental health crisis. It is a documented production, not a company workshop; a workshop for your managers rehearses the one-to-one conversation instead.

Is there evidence that rehearsal works better than a slideshow?

In a randomised 2020 UCL study by co-founder Ben Laumann (n = 57), rehearsal with a role-play coach produced significantly better feedback delivery than an instructional slideshow or video. Two independent assessors rated it blind. The rehearsal condition was a short online coaching session, not our programme, and the study tested feedback rather than a mental health conversation. It is unpublished; what it shows and what it does not is set out on our research page.

How do you measure whether the workshop worked?

Measurement sits at Kirkpatrick Level 3, meaning observed behaviour at work rather than satisfaction scores. Before delivery we agree a small number of behavioural indicators with the client, such as whether return-to-work conversations happen before the return. They are re-read three to six weeks after delivery and again at around 90 days. The indicators describe what managers do, not anyone's health.

Where in London do you deliver, and how is it priced?

Most programmes are delivered in-house at client offices across London. Sidestream is based at 58 Malden Road, London NW5 3HG, and works from London, Milan and Berlin. Work is priced per engagement, because the effort sits in the scenario design and the actor briefing rather than in the delivery day.

Sources

  1. Deloitte (May 2024), Mental health and employers: the case for employers to invest in supporting working parents and a mentally healthy workplace (PDF)
  2. HSE, Work-related stress, depression or anxiety statistics in Great Britain, 2025 (published 20 November 2025, PDF)
  3. HSE, Advice for managers on mental ill health conditions
  4. HSE, What are the Management Standards?
  5. HSE, Stress Talking Toolkits
  6. Acas, Talking about mental health (Supporting mental health at work)
  7. Acas, Support and training (Supporting mental health at work)
  8. Schwarz, E. et al. (2019), Long-Term Attitude Change After a Single-Day Manager Training Addressing Mental Health at the Workplace, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(24), 5105
  9. Michie, van Stralen and West (2011), The behaviour change wheel, Implementation Science 6, 42
  10. Kirkpatrick, J. and Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016), Kirkpatrick's Four Levels of Training Evaluation
  11. Laumann, B. (2020), UCL, unpublished research paper, summarised on our research page
Sidestream

Take Action

Tell Us What
Is Not Shifting

Free 30-minute call about the behaviour you need to change and the teams it sits in. We will tell you honestly whether rehearsal is the right tool.